From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932150AbWFFN3z (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:29:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932159AbWFFN3y (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:29:54 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]:50856 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932150AbWFFN3y convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:29:54 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LFylhLCwOI3VJ+E7yfB9JSI72BOAfGqjoO+GSRgkb2A0j52RVX9yyzAn9vtH2Fod572RNYEY6LbgirpXxGATLkMRazCBxqG6WJq0YHWVWpn9olIGMyZCGVbghx9fRr1Grzz6AtPBTDymWz/xh2P51IIX5eXagSF6Pa/XESXdx1I= Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:29:07 +0200 From: Diego Calleja To: be-news06@lina.inka.de (Bernd Eckenfels) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Update sysctl documentation Message-Id: <20060606152907.1eccaefb.diegocg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20060606035833.bee909af.diegocg@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org El Tue, 06 Jun 2006 05:28:22 +0200, be-news06@lina.inka.de (Bernd Eckenfels) escribió: > In the net case for example ipv4/conf/* is such a usefull cluster, > especially since there is this dynamic all/default/ functionality. Well, all the subdirectories under ipv4/conf/* have the same set of files. The differences between each directory is documented in ipv4/conf/README > And I also think you should not create TODO single-line files, better I'd rather get some feedback and document all of them, to be fair, i'll look into the source to guess what are they doing. > BTW: perhaps some markup would be nice so we can create the man pages out of > it? One thing I am impressed with in the BSD world is the existence of > up-to-date Kernel ABI man pages. Well, it'd be nice, but I'm afraid that it wouldn't be easy :) To start with, we'd also need to document everything under sysfs....