Re: NI5010 network driver -- MAINTAINERS entry

[Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>]

Hi,

On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:22:14PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> ...is quite inconsistent with rest of file:
> 
> NI5010 NETWORK DRIVER
> P:      Jan-Pascal van Best and Andreas Mohr
> M:      Jan-Pascal van Best <jvbest@qv3pluto.leidenuniv.nl>
> M:      Andreas Mohr <100.30936@germany.net>
> L:      netdev@vger.kernel.org
> S:      Maintained
> 
> probably should be
> 
> NI5010 NETWORK DRIVER
> P:      Jan-Pascal van Best
> M:      jvbest@qv3pluto.leidenuniv.nl
> P:	Andreas Mohr
> M:      100.30936@germany.net

Err, not quite ;)

> L:      netdev@vger.kernel.org
> S:      Maintained
> 
> ...yes, "new" mail address format makes sense, but I guess whole file
> should be converted.

Right, I've been looking at this entry some time ago and thought that I
should send an update patch, but haven't gotten around to doing that yet.

Problem is that I'm not actively using this (admittedly historic) card
any more, so bug reports about this driver would probably have to be fixed
by the reporter or alternatively get delayed some time (I'm willing to
look into any reports, so status "Maintained" would still be sort of valid,
I think).

My currently "best" mail address is andi@lisas.de, not sure about
the validity of Jan-Pascal van Best's address, though.

Should I send an update patch (to -mm tree?), or do you want to do it?

Andreas Mohr