From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964881AbWFHPls (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:41:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964884AbWFHPls (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:41:48 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:18149 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S964881AbWFHPlr (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:41:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:44:33 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, akpm@osdl.org, jamagallon@ono.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ignore smp_locks section warnings from init/exit code Message-Id: <20060608084433.3b612916.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <20060607212958.5270a860.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20060607104724.c5d3d730.akpm@osdl.org> <20060608003153.36f59e6a@werewolf.auna.net> <20060607154054.cf4f2512.akpm@osdl.org> <20060607162326.3d2cc76b.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20060608021149.GA5567@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060607193225.989add4c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20060608042109.GA6337@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060607212958.5270a860.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.5 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:29:58 -0700 Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 00:21:09 -0400 Jeff Dike wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:32:25PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > > make ARCH=um allmodconfig > > > /var/linsrc/linux-2617-rc6mm1/arch/um/Makefile:113: *** missing separator. Stop. > > > > > > is that known/fixed? > > > > No. rc6-mm1 builds fine here. I just checked with a fresh tree. > > > > Are you sure you have a clean tree? > > Yes, must be some toolchain problem. > I'll look at it more, but it's somewhat low priority for me. FWIW, I get this same error on 2 different systems, x86_64 + distro1 vs. i386 + distro2. Odd. --- ~Randy