From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1030525AbWFIVmF@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1030525AbWFIVmF (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:42:05 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030526AbWFIVmF
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:42:05 -0400
Received: from kevlar.burdell.org ([66.92.73.214]:14060 "EHLO
	kevlar.burdell.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030525AbWFIVmD
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:42:03 -0400
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:42:00 -0400
From: Sonny Rao <sonny@burdell.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, hch@infradead.org, cmm@us.ibm.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
       linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
Message-ID: <20060609214200.GA18213@kevlar.burdell.org>
References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060609091327.GA3679@infradead.org> <20060609030759.48cd17a0.akpm@osdl.org> <44899653.1020007@garzik.org> <20060609095620.22326f9d.akpm@osdl.org> <4489AAD9.80806@garzik.org> <20060609103543.52c00c62.akpm@osdl.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060609103543.52c00c62.akpm@osdl.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:35:43AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
<snip> 
> All that being said, Linux's filesystems are looking increasingly crufty
> and we are getting to the time where we would benefit from a greenfield
> start-a-new-one.  

I'm curious about this comment; in what way are they _collectively_
looking crufty ?