From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932572AbWFKG0v (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:26:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932575AbWFKG0v (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:26:51 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:22672 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932572AbWFKG0u (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:26:50 -0400 From: Darren Hart Organization: IBM Linux Technology Center To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -rt] Priority preemption latency Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:24:58 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kerneL@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner References: <200606091701.55185.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> <20060610064850.GA11002@elte.hu> <200606102249.26063.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200606102249.26063.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606102324.58932.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Thanks for the updated patch! It wouldn't quite build (proc_misc.c still > referenced the old rt_overload_* variables, fixup patch attached removing > those print statements). I have it running on a 4 way opteron box running > prio-preempt in a timed while loop, exiting only on failure. It's been > running fine for several minutes - usually fails in under a mintue. We'll > see how it's doing in the morning :-) Well it failed in about 14 minutes. The machine was under heavy load running another benchmark. I have removed the secondary benchmark and am running prio-preempt alone on the same 4 way opteron box. Will post again when I know more... -- Darren Hart IBM Linux Technology Center Realtime Linux Team