From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1750753AbWFLCtj@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1750753AbWFLCtj (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:49:39 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750756AbWFLCtj
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:49:39 -0400
Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:29341 "HELO xenotime.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750753AbWFLCtj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:49:39 -0400
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 19:52:25 -0700
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: sam@ravnborg.org, akpm@osdl.org, jamagallon@ono.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ignore smp_locks section warnings from init/exit code
Message-Id: <20060611195225.d1698734.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060612022958.GA24148@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
References: <20060607104724.c5d3d730.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20060608003153.36f59e6a@werewolf.auna.net>
	<20060607154054.cf4f2512.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20060607162326.3d2cc76b.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
	<20060608021149.GA5567@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
	<20060608183549.GB18815@mars.ravnborg.org>
	<20060611232558.GB20639@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
	<20060611171740.b7f8e0fc.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
	<20060612022958.GA24148@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
Organization: YPO4
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.5 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:29:58 -0400 Jeff Dike wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:17:40PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > > gdb tells me:
> > > 	(gdb) x/4xa 0x6027b748
> > > 	0x6027b748 <stdout@@GLIBC_2.2.5>:       0x0     0x0
> > > 	0x6027b758 <completed.6111+8>:  0x0     0x0
> > > 
> > > So, with stdout@@GLIBC_2.2.5 at 0x6027b748 and completed.6111 at
> > > 0x6027b750 - right next to each other - there would seem to be nothing
> > > between them to reference anything.
> > 
> > gdb says 0x6027b758 for <completed.6111>, not 0x6027b750 as you
> > wrote, so there's 8 more bytes for gunk there.  ;)
> > Anyway, since I can't build UML, I'm willing to look at the
> 
> gdb says 0x6027b758 for <completed.6111+8>, making
> completed.6111 = 0x6027b750, leaving 0 bytes for gunk.

um. ack.

---
~Randy