From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751093AbWFLHSX (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:18:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751073AbWFLHSX (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:18:23 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:20955 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751025AbWFLHSW (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:18:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20060612.001829.49243997.davem@davemloft.net> To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Cc: mingo@elte.hu, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, jirislaby@gmail.com, akpm@osdl.org, arjan@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] undo AF_UNIX _bh locking changes and split lock-type instead From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060612070356.GA1273@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20060612064122.GA1101@gondor.apana.org.au> <20060612065701.GA24213@elte.hu> <20060612070356.GA1273@gondor.apana.org.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Herbert Xu Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:03:56 +1000 > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > regarding your point wrt. path of integration - it is pretty much the > > only practical way to do this centrally as part of the lock validator > > patches, but to collect ACKs from subsystem maintainers in the process. > > So if you like it i'd like to have your ACK but this patch depends on > > the other lock validator patches (and only makes sense together with > > them), so they should temporarily stay in the lock validator queue. > > Hopefully this wont be a state that lasts too long and once the > > validator is upstream, all patches of course go via the subsystem > > submission rules. > > Obviously as long as Dave is happy with it then it's fine. However, > it's probably a good idea to cc netdev for relevant patches so that > they get a wider review. If you've already sent this one there then > I apologise for missing it :) Yes, this is fine with me.