From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752055AbWFLPig (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:38:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752059AbWFLPif (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:38:35 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:6545 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752055AbWFLPif (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:38:35 -0400 From: Darren Hart To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -rt] Priority preemption latency Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:38:24 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner References: <200606091701.55185.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> <200606102324.58932.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> <20060611073609.GA12456@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20060611073609.GA12456@elte.hu> Organization: IBM Linux Technology Center MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606120838.25200.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 11 June 2006 00:36, Ingo Molnar wrote: > ok - could you try the patch from today (re-attached below)? Maybe that > theoretical scenario i mentioned is only theoretical in theory ;-) > > Ingo I started running this version of the patch with prio-preemt in a loop over 10 hours ago, and it's still running. This seems to be the right fix. Thanks! -- Darren Hart IBM Linux Technology Center Realtime Linux Team