From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752068AbWFLPmF (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:42:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752066AbWFLPmF (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:42:05 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:14510 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752056AbWFLPmC (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:42:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:44:47 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: "Langsdorf, Mark" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [discuss] x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases Message-Id: <20060612084447.385b1c9d.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A84303218DB5@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com> References: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A84303218DB5@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.5 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:11:44 -0500 Langsdorf, Mark wrote: > > >We still have a patches@x86-64 mailing list on x86-64.org which is > > >mostly unused. If I moved the big patch floods over there, would the > > >people who do reviews subscribe there? Please comment. > > > > I certainly would subscribe there if you want to split > > things. Depending on your intentions, I could also switch to > > send patches there. But if I'm asked about my preferences, > > I'd rather see things stay on the discuss list (as sending > > patches is generally meant to trigger discussion if need be). I agree with Jan, one list is preferable IMO. However, please let us know if it is split so that we will know to subscribe to the other list. > I'd prefer to see patches sent to patches@x86-64.org, > as that will make them easier to track. However, I > agree with Jan that discussion of patches should occur > on discuss@x86-64.org. It should be possible to make > all responses from patches@x86-64.org go to > discuss@x86-64.org. --- ~Randy