From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751846AbWFLK5T (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:57:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751852AbWFLK5T (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:57:19 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:49551 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751846AbWFLK5S (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:57:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:56:21 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Anton Altaparmakov Cc: Miles Lane , LKML , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm1 -- BUG: possible circular locking deadlock detected! Message-ID: <20060612105621.GA10887@elte.hu> References: <20060608112306.GA4234@elte.hu> <1149840563.3619.46.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20060610075954.GA30119@elte.hu> <20060611053154.GA8581@elte.hu> <20060612083117.GA29026@elte.hu> <1150102041.24273.15.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20060612094011.GA32640@elte.hu> <1150107897.24273.25.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1150107897.24273.25.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: -3.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-3.1 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > below i've attached a cleaned up version of my NTFS annotations so far. > > I think they are pretty straightforward and nonintrusive - for > > !CONFIG_LOCKDEP they add zero changes to ntfs.ko. Most of the linecount > > of the patch comes from comments - so i think we might even consider > > this a "document locking rules" patch :-) > > Thanks, looks great! Can I leave it to you to keep it as part of the > lock validator patches so it gets into -mm with them and later makes > it into the stock kernel with them? sure! > If you want, feel free to add: > > Signed-off-by: Anton Altaparmakov > > To the patch... thanks - added. If anyone wants to try the NTFS related lock-validator fixes, they are included in the combo patch: http://redhat.com/~mingo/lockdep-patches/lockdep-combo-2.6.17-rc6-mm2.patch which goes ontop of 2.6.17-rc6-mm2. Ingo