mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
To: Emmanuel Fleury <emmanuel.fleury@labri.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] i386: use C code for current_thread_info()
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:14:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606121317_MC3-1-C23A-4F2D@compuserve.com> (raw)

In-Reply-To: <448C85B7.1010902@labri.fr>

On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 23:05:59 +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:

> > Looking at the generated code, it seems the compiler just makes dumb
> > choices and tends to recompute current_thread_info() in unlikely code
> > paths even when there is no register pressure.  4.0.2 makes better
> > choices.
>
> What size with gcc 4.1.2 ? (just curiosity)

The 3.3 vs 4.0 comparisons were with two different configs, so only
relative gain/loss with asm vs. C could be compared.

I downloaded gcc 4.1.1 and compared to 4.0.2 with the exact same config,
since I was curious how much better it might be overall.

gcc 4.0.2:
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
3645212	 555556	 312024	4512792	 44dc18	2.6.17-rc6-nb-C/vmlinux
3647276	 555556	 312024	4514856	 44e428	2.6.17-rc6-nb-asm/vmlinux
  -2064

gcc 4.1.1:
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
3614686	 520416	 311672	4446774	 43da36	2.6.17-rc6-nb-C/vmlinux
3616942	 520416	 311672	4449030	 43e306	2.6.17-rc6-nb-asm/vmlinux
  -2256

Kernel code starts out ~30K bytes smaller with gcc 4.1 and using C
for current_thread_info() helps even more than with 4.0.  Nice...

Maybe a patch that enables C code for gcc 4.0+ would work, since
on 3.3 the asm code is better?

-- 
Chuck

             reply	other threads:[~2006-06-12 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-12 17:14 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2006-06-12 17:55 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-06-12 18:48 ` Andreas Mohr
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-13  5:26 Albert Cahalan
2006-06-13  1:50 Chuck Ebbert
2006-06-13  6:43 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-06-13  9:27   ` Avi Kivity
2006-06-11 20:43 Chuck Ebbert
2006-06-11 21:05 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2006-06-11 19:07 Chuck Ebbert
2006-06-11 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-11 19:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-06-11 20:33   ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-06-11 20:44   ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-06-12  8:10     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200606121317_MC3-1-C23A-4F2D@compuserve.com \
    --to=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=emmanuel.fleury@labri.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®