From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964778AbWFMWXr (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:23:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964781AbWFMWXq (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:23:46 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:5598 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964778AbWFMWXp (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:23:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20060613.152359.109570552.davem@davemloft.net> To: chase.venters@clientec.com Cc: jheffner@psc.edu, torvalds@osdl.org, lkml@rtr.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.17: networking bug?? From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <448F03B3.5040501@psc.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Chase Venters Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:09:16 -0500 (CDT) > Does anyone have any interesting statistics on how often end-users > are likely to run into this crap? I think it's much less likely than the ECN stuff, by a long shot.