From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932083AbWFMTxy (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:53:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932105AbWFMTxy (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:53:54 -0400 Received: from rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de ([129.143.116.10]:65502 "EHLO rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932083AbWFMTxy (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:53:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:53:52 +0200 From: Andreas Mohr To: Andrew Morton Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH -mm] i386: cpu_relax() smp.c (was: [RFC -mm] more cpu_relax() places?) Message-ID: <20060613195352.GA24167@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> References: <20060612183743.GA28610@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060612183743.GA28610@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Priority: none Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:37:43PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Hi all, > > while reviewing 2.6.17-rc6-mm1, I found some places that might > want to make use of cpu_relax() in order to not block secondary > pipelines while busy-polling (probably especially useful on SMT CPUs): OK, no replies arguing against anything, thus patch follow-up. ;) (no. 1 of 3) Signed-off-by: Andreas Mohr diff -urN linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2.orig/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2.my/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c --- linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2.orig/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c 2006-06-08 10:38:04.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2.my/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c 2006-06-13 19:33:22.000000000 +0200 @@ -388,9 +388,11 @@ */ send_IPI_mask(cpumask, INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR); - while (!cpus_empty(flush_cpumask)) + while (!cpus_empty(flush_cpumask)) { + cpu_relax(); /* nothing. lockup detection does not belong here */ mb(); + } flush_mm = NULL; flush_va = 0;