mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC]  Slimming down struct inode
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 07:50:19 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060615075018.B884384@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17551.58643.704359.815153@gargle.gargle.HOWL>; from nikita@clusterfs.com on Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 02:29:39PM +0400

Hi Nikita,

On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 02:29:39PM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote:
> Sorry, but why this operation is needed? Generic code (in fs/*.c)
> doesn't use ->i_blksize at all. If XFS wants to provide per-inode
> st_blksize, all it has to do is to store preferred buffer size in its
> file system specific inode (struct xfs_inode), and use something
> different from generic_fillattr() as its ->i_op->getattr() callback
> (xfs_vn_getattr()).

We already do this.  The original questions were related to whether
i_blksize and i_blkbits need to be per-inode or per-filesystem, and
thats what I was trying to answer...

| 1) Move i_blksize (optimal size for I/O, reported by the stat system
|   call).  Is there any reason why this needs to be per-inode, instead
|   of per-filesystem?
| 2) Move i_blkbits (blocksize for doing direct I/O in bits) to struct
|    super.  Again, why is this per-inode?

As to whether a new inode operation is useful/needed - *shrug* - not
really my call, I was saying we can work with whatever ends up being
the final solution, provided it keeps per-inode granularity.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-14 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-09 23:50 Theodore Ts'o
2006-06-10  0:24 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-06-10  1:27 ` Al Viro
2006-06-10  1:56   ` Theodore Tso
2006-06-10  6:24     ` Stefan Richter
2006-06-10 10:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-06-10 15:04   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-13  4:35     ` Nathan Scott
2006-06-13  4:32   ` Nathan Scott
2006-06-13 14:00     ` Avi Kivity
2006-06-13 17:44       ` Theodore Tso
2006-06-13 18:08         ` Avi Kivity
2006-06-13 20:10           ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-06-13 20:25             ` Avi Kivity
2006-06-13 22:41       ` Nathan Scott
2006-06-14 10:29         ` Nikita Danilov
2006-06-14 21:50           ` Nathan Scott [this message]
2006-06-15  5:49             ` Theodore Tso
2006-06-15  7:01               ` Nathan Scott
2006-06-15  8:46                 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-15 10:20                   ` Nathan Scott
2006-06-14 23:27           ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-06-15 10:09             ` Nikita Danilov
2006-06-10 11:03 ` Tomasz Torcz
2006-06-10 15:06   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-15  0:16 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-15  4:43   ` Theodore Tso
2006-06-15  8:27     ` Brian F. G. Bidulock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060615075018.B884384@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com \
    --to=nathans@sgi.com \
    --cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikita@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®