From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: sturmflut@lieberbiber.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] vdso: improve print_fatal_signals support by adding memory maps
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:58:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060617225813.1f0fbe15.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060617215818.7bc728af.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:58:18 -0700
"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 16:14:52 +0200 Simon Raffeiner wrote:
>
> > When compiling 2.6.17-rc6-mm2 (which contains this patch) my gcc 4.0.3 (Ubuntu
> > 4.0.3-1ubuntu5) complains about "int len;" being used uninitialized in
> > print_vma(). AFAICS len is not initialized and then passed to
> > pad_len_spaces(int len), which uses it for some calculations.
> >
> > I also noticed that similar code is used in fs/proc/task_mmu.c, where
> > show_map_internal() passes an uninitialised int len; to pad_len_spaces(struct
> > seq_file *m, int len).
>
> Ack both of those. And both of them pass &len as a parameter to
> printk/seq_printf where it looks as though they want just <len>
> (after it has been initialized).
>
printk("%n", &len) will initialise `len'. gcc is being wrong again.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-18 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-17 14:14 Simon Raffeiner
2006-06-18 4:58 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-06-18 5:58 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-06-18 13:25 ` Simon Raffeiner
2006-06-18 17:42 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-06-18 18:29 ` Simon Raffeiner
2006-06-18 18:38 ` Randy.Dunlap
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-23 0:01 Ingo Molnar
2006-05-23 22:26 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-05-24 5:34 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060617225813.1f0fbe15.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=sturmflut@lieberbiber.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®