From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: kernel@kolivas.org, sam@vilain.net, bsingharora@gmail.com,
vatsa@in.ibm.com, pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, dev@openvz.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, kingsley@aurema.com,
ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, mingo@elte.hu,
rene.herman@keyaccess.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 02:50:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060618025046.77b0cecf.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060618082638.6061.20172.sendpatchset@heathwren.pw.nest>
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:26:38 +1000
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> These patches implement CPU usage rate limits for tasks.
Via /proc/pid/cpu_rate_cap. Important detail, that.
People are going to want to extend this to capping a *group* of tasks, with
some yet-to-be-determined means of tying those tasks together. How well
suited is this code to that extension?
If the task can exceed its cap without impacting any other tasks (ie: there
is spare idle capacity), what happens? I trust that spare capacity gets
used? (Is this termed "work conserving"?)
> 5. Code size measurements:
>
> Vanilla kernel:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 33800 4689 296 38785 9781 sched.o
> 2554 79 0 2633 a49 mutex.o
> 12076 2632 0 14708 3974 base.o
>
> Patches applied:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 36870 4721 296 41887 a39f sched.o
> 2630 79 0 2709 a95 mutex.o
> 13011 2920 0 15931 3e3b base.o
>
> Indicating that the size cost of the patch proper is about
> 3 kilobytes and the procfs costs about another 1.2 kilobytes.
>
hm. That seems rather a lot. I guess it's not a simple thing to do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-18 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-18 8:26 Peter Williams
2006-06-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: Add CPU rate soft caps Peter Williams
2006-06-18 8:38 ` Con Kolivas
2006-06-18 15:52 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-19 1:21 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: Add CPU rate hard caps Peter Williams
2006-06-18 8:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: Add procfs interface for CPU rate soft caps Peter Williams
2006-06-18 8:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: Add procfs interface for CPU rate hard caps Peter Williams
2006-06-18 9:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-06-18 10:25 ` [PATCH 0/4] sched: Add CPU rate caps Peter Williams
2006-06-18 11:42 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-06-18 12:19 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-19 0:13 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-19 1:03 ` [ckrm-tech] " Peter Williams
2006-06-19 2:20 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-19 3:17 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-19 3:31 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-19 3:50 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-19 8:30 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-19 11:35 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-19 11:33 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-19 23:09 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-20 4:28 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-20 4:40 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-20 5:56 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-19 5:04 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-19 23:59 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-19 18:55 ` [ckrm-tech] " Chris Friesen
2006-06-19 23:28 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-22 1:52 Peter Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060618025046.77b0cecf.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=dev@openvz.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=kingsley@aurema.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
--cc=sam@vilain.net \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®