From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932262AbWFRRWd (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:22:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932266AbWFRRWd (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:22:33 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:61569 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932262AbWFRRWc (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:22:32 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:25:17 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: 76306.1226@compuserve.com, ak@suse.de, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.16-rc6-mm2] x86: add NUMA to oops messages Message-Id: <20060618102517.99745bf7.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <44954B9B.6070209@linux.intel.com> References: <200606180815_MC3-1-C2CC-41A5@compuserve.com> <44954B9B.6070209@linux.intel.com> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.5 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:48:27 +0200 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Chuck Ebbert wrote: > >> and putting half of .config into the oops doesn't seem > >> like a good long term strategy. > > > > It's just this one thing; I can't think of anything else to add... > > > > if it's compact I'd actually put the entire vermagic line there... > it'll show compiler, preempt and a whole lot of other "distinctive" features Yep, I like that idea too. --- ~Randy