From: arnd@arndb.de
To: paulus@samba.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masato Noguchi <Masato.Noguchi@jp.sony.com>
Subject: [patch 18/20] spufs: clear class2 interrupt status before wakeup
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:33:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060619183406.626878000@klappe.arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060619183315.653672000@klappe.arndb.de>
[-- Attachment #1: spufs-fix-class2-clear-stat-before-wakeup.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3700 bytes --]
From: Masato Noguchi <Masato.Noguchi@jp.sony.com>
SPU interrupt status must be cleared before handle it.
Otherwise, kernel may drop some interrupt packet.
Currently, class2 interrupt treated like:
1) call callback to wake up waiting process
2) mask raised mailbox interrupt
3) clear interrupt status
I changed like:
1) mask raised mailbox interrupt
2) clear interrupt status
3) call callback to wake up waiting process
Clearing status before masking will make spurious interrupt.
Thus, it is necessary to hold by steps I described above, I think.
Signed-off-by: Masato Noguchi <Masato.Noguchi@jp.sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
===================================================================
--- powerpc.git.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
+++ powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
@@ -140,55 +140,7 @@ static int __spu_trap_data_map(struct sp
spu->dar = ea;
spu->dsisr = dsisr;
mb();
- if (spu->stop_callback)
- spu->stop_callback(spu);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int __spu_trap_mailbox(struct spu *spu)
-{
- if (spu->ibox_callback)
- spu->ibox_callback(spu);
-
- /* atomically disable SPU mailbox interrupts */
- spin_lock(&spu->register_lock);
- spu_int_mask_and(spu, 2, ~0x1);
- spin_unlock(&spu->register_lock);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int __spu_trap_stop(struct spu *spu)
-{
- pr_debug("%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
- if (spu->stop_callback)
- spu->stop_callback(spu);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int __spu_trap_halt(struct spu *spu)
-{
- pr_debug("%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
- if (spu->stop_callback)
- spu->stop_callback(spu);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int __spu_trap_tag_group(struct spu *spu)
-{
- pr_debug("%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
- spu->mfc_callback(spu);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int __spu_trap_spubox(struct spu *spu)
-{
- if (spu->wbox_callback)
- spu->wbox_callback(spu);
-
- /* atomically disable SPU mailbox interrupts */
- spin_lock(&spu->register_lock);
- spu_int_mask_and(spu, 2, ~0x10);
- spin_unlock(&spu->register_lock);
+ spu->stop_callback(spu);
return 0;
}
@@ -199,8 +151,7 @@ spu_irq_class_0(int irq, void *data, str
spu = data;
spu->class_0_pending = 1;
- if (spu->stop_callback)
- spu->stop_callback(spu);
+ spu->stop_callback(spu);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -278,29 +229,38 @@ spu_irq_class_2(int irq, void *data, str
unsigned long mask;
spu = data;
+ spin_lock(&spu->register_lock);
stat = spu_int_stat_get(spu, 2);
mask = spu_int_mask_get(spu, 2);
+ /* ignore interrupts we're not waiting for */
+ stat &= mask;
+ /*
+ * mailbox interrupts (0x1 and 0x10) are level triggered.
+ * mask them now before acknowledging.
+ */
+ if (stat & 0x11)
+ spu_int_mask_and(spu, 2, ~(stat & 0x11));
+ /* acknowledge all interrupts before the callbacks */
+ spu_int_stat_clear(spu, 2, stat);
+ spin_unlock(&spu->register_lock);
pr_debug("class 2 interrupt %d, %lx, %lx\n", irq, stat, mask);
- stat &= mask;
-
if (stat & 1) /* PPC core mailbox */
- __spu_trap_mailbox(spu);
+ spu->ibox_callback(spu);
if (stat & 2) /* SPU stop-and-signal */
- __spu_trap_stop(spu);
+ spu->stop_callback(spu);
if (stat & 4) /* SPU halted */
- __spu_trap_halt(spu);
+ spu->stop_callback(spu);
if (stat & 8) /* DMA tag group complete */
- __spu_trap_tag_group(spu);
+ spu->mfc_callback(spu);
if (stat & 0x10) /* SPU mailbox threshold */
- __spu_trap_spubox(spu);
+ spu->wbox_callback(spu);
- spu_int_stat_clear(spu, 2, stat);
return stat ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
}
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-19 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-19 18:33 [patch 00/20] cell: patches for 2.6.18 arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 01/20] cell: add RAS support arnd
2006-06-20 15:43 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] " Olof Johansson
2006-06-20 16:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-06-20 17:50 ` Olof Johansson
2006-06-20 19:00 ` Geoff Levand
2006-06-21 1:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 02/20] cell: fix interrupt priority handling arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 03/20] cell: update defconfig arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 04/20] cell: register SPUs as sysdevs arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 05/20] cell: always build spu base into the kernel arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 06/20] spufs: restore mapping of mssync register arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 07/20] spufs: fix deadlock in spu_create error path arnd
2006-06-20 1:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 08/20] spufs: set up correct SLB entries for 64k pages arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 09/20] spufs: add a phys-id attribute to each SPU context arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 10/20] spufs: fix initial state of wbox file arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 11/20] spufs: use kzalloc in create_spu arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 12/20] spufs: dont try to access SPE channel 1 count arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 13/20] spufs: split the Cell BE support into generic and platform dependant parts arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 14/20] spufs: further abstract priv1 register access arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 15/20] spufs: fix spu irq affinity setting arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 16/20] spufs: remove stop_code from struct spu arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 17/20] spufs: fix Makefile for "make clean" arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` arnd [this message]
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 19/20] spufs: fail spu_create with invalid flags arnd
2006-06-19 18:33 ` [patch 20/20] spufs: one more fix for 64k pages arnd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060619183406.626878000@klappe.arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Masato.Noguchi@jp.sony.com \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®