From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1030215AbWFTJa5@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1030215AbWFTJa5 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 20 Jun 2006 05:30:57 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030213AbWFTJa4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 20 Jun 2006 05:30:56 -0400
Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:30644 "EHLO
	vavatch.codon.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1030208AbWFTJaz (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 20 Jun 2006 05:30:55 -0400
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:30:51 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] acpi: Add IBM R60E laptop to proc-idle blacklist
Message-ID: <20060620093051.GB27807@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <4491BC6B.5000704@oracle.com> <20060619203333.5e897ead.akpm@osdl.org> <87lkrstrgy.fsf@benpfaff.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87lkrstrgy.fsf@benpfaff.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vavatch.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:51:09PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:

> The email says R60e.
> The string says R40e.
> Which is correct?

The string is correct. There is no R60e, to the best of my knowledge.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org