From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751325AbWFTPo2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:44:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751333AbWFTPo2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:44:28 -0400 Received: from lixom.net ([66.141.50.11]:26792 "EHLO mail.lixom.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751325AbWFTPo2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:44:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:43:04 -0500 To: arnd@arndb.de Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [patch 01/20] cell: add RAS support Message-ID: <20060620154304.GD4845@pb15.lixom.net> References: <20060619183315.653672000@klappe.arndb.de> <20060619183404.144740000@klappe.arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060619183404.144740000@klappe.arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: Olof Johansson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:33:16PM +0200, arnd@arndb.de wrote: > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > > This is a first version of support for the Cell BE "Reliability, > Availability and Serviceability" features. Does it really make sense to do this under a config option? I don't see why anyone would not want to know that their machine is about to melt. -Olof