From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751001AbWFTUlN (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:41:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751002AbWFTUlN (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:41:13 -0400 Received: from mx.pathscale.com ([64.160.42.68]:58072 "EHLO mx.pathscale.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750870AbWFTUlK (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:41:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:41:09 -0700 From: Greg Lindahl To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: ak@suse.de, olson@unixfolk.com, discuss@x86-64.org, brice@myri.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities Message-ID: <20060620204109.GA1980@greglaptop.internal.keyresearch.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Randy.Dunlap" , ak@suse.de, olson@unixfolk.com, discuss@x86-64.org, brice@myri.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de References: <200606200925.30926.ak@suse.de> <20060620200352.GJ1414@greglaptop.internal.keyresearch.com> <20060620132049.ff5e6f67.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060620132049.ff5e6f67.rdunlap@xenotime.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Frumious: Bandersnatch Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:20:49PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > Does it cover the 10 new models that are available tomorrow? > (hypothetical question) I see several people on this list who are aware of forthcoming PCI Express server products, and they aren't objecting to broad whitelisting of PCI Express. Is there any known case of PCI Express and MSI not working on any chipset? Andi, is the tg3 NIC that didn't work in a Supermicro system on PCI-X or PCI Express? -- greg