From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751607AbWFVEQH (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:16:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751635AbWFVEQG (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:16:06 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:32710 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751607AbWFVEQE (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:16:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:15:34 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ananda Raju Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dgc@sgi.com, balbir@in.ibm.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, neilb@suse.de, jblunck@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de, ananda.raju@neterion.com, leonid.grossman@neterion.com, ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com, alicia.pena@neterion.com Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.17] s2io driver irq fix Message-Id: <20060621211534.b740d0f8.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:50:49 -0400 (EDT) Ananda Raju wrote: > + if (sp->intr_type == MSI_X) { > + int i; > > - free_irq(vector, arg); > + for (i=1; (sp->s2io_entries[i].in_use == MSIX_FLG); i++) { > + if (sp->s2io_entries[i].type == MSIX_FIFO_TYPE) { > + sprintf(sp->desc[i], "%s:MSI-X-%d-TX", > + dev->name, i); > + err = request_irq(sp->entries[i].vector, > + s2io_msix_fifo_handle, 0, sp->desc[i], > + sp->s2io_entries[i].arg); Is it usual to prohibit IRQ sharing with msix?