From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750981AbWFWCya (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:54:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750985AbWFWCya (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:54:30 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:28313 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750968AbWFWCya (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:54:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:54:09 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz, jeremy@goop.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net, clameter@sgi.com, ntl@pobox.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, ak@suse.de, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid cpu removal if busy revisited Message-Id: <20060622195409.1ea44604.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060623105058.96937576.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20060623105058.96937576.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:50:58 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > +static int test_cpu_busy(int cpu) > ... > + if (moderate_cpu_removal && test_cpu_bust(cpu)) I love the function name but alas, the linker will not. Let's treat this as an [rfc]. Please test the final version carefully.