From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161345AbWFVUqb (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:46:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161348AbWFVUqb (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:46:31 -0400 Received: from dspnet.fr.eu.org ([213.186.44.138]:12817 "EHLO dspnet.fr.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161345AbWFVUqa (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:46:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:46:27 +0200 From: Olivier Galibert To: "Hack inc." Subject: Is the x86-64 kernel size limit real? Message-ID: <20060622204627.GA47994@dspnet.fr.eu.org> Mail-Followup-To: Olivier Galibert , "Hack inc." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I get bitched at by the build process because the kernel I get is around 4.5Mb compressed. i386 does not have that limitation. Interestingly, a diff between the two build.c gives: --- ../../../i386/boot/tools/build.c 2006-06-22 20:19:33.000000000 +0200 +++ build.c 2006-06-22 20:19:33.000000000 +0200 @@ -70,8 +70,7 @@ int main(int argc, char ** argv) { - unsigned int i, sz, setup_sectors; - int c; + unsigned int i, c, sz, setup_sectors; u32 sys_size; byte major_root, minor_root; struct stat sb; @@ -150,8 +149,10 @@ sz = sb.st_size; fprintf (stderr, "System is %d kB\n", sz/1024); sys_size = (sz + 15) / 16; - if (!is_big_kernel && sys_size > DEF_SYSSIZE) - die("System is too big. Try using bzImage or modules."); + /* 0x40000*16 = 4.0 MB, reasonable estimate for the current maximum */ + if (sys_size > (is_big_kernel ? 0x40000 : DEF_SYSSIZE)) + die("System is too big. Try using %smodules.", + is_big_kernel ? "" : "bzImage or "); while (sz > 0) { int l, n; which shows two things: 1- a8f5034540195307362d071a8b387226b410469f should have a x86-64 version 2- the limit looks entirely artificial So, is removing the limit prone to bite me? OG. PS: Please do not turn this thread into a pro/against modules ones, TYVM.