From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750914AbWFVX5g (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:57:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751539AbWFVX5g (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:57:36 -0400 Received: from electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com ([213.41.134.224]:14302 "EHLO fr.zoreil.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750901AbWFVX5f (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:57:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 01:53:56 +0200 From: Francois Romieu To: Danial Thom Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts Message-ID: <20060622235356.GA31168@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <20060622175724.GA28913@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20060622224759.25253.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060622224759.25253.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Organisation: Land of Sunshine Inc. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Danial Thom : [...] > systat". Plus its clear that the guy who gave the > answer doesn't know what he's talking about, > since he's actually trying to explain away the > problem as being normal. "75 kpps means 10% of the max load" was quite fun too. [...] > the system is perpetually 100% idle but its > dropping packets due to excessive backlog. No difference when you renice ksoftirqd to a strongly negative value ? -- Ueimor