From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932983AbWFWKCF (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:02:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932986AbWFWKCF (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:02:05 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:2228 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932983AbWFWKCD (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:02:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:01:32 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andrew Morton Cc: Kevin Corry , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agk@redhat.com, mbroz@redhat.com, hch@lst.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] dm: support ioctls on mapped devices Message-ID: <20060623100132.GB6985@lst.de> References: <20060621193121.GP4521@agk.surrey.redhat.com> <20060622151721.GT19222@agk.surrey.redhat.com> <20060622095551.b5c6ddce.akpm@osdl.org> <200606222231.17465.kevcorry@us.ibm.com> <20060622204907.48c0b841.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060622204907.48c0b841.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -4.901 () BAYES_00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 08:49:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > My head is spinning in a twisty maze of ioctls. What _should_ we call? > file_operations.foo_ioctl() or block_device_operations.foo_ioctl() or > blkdev_ioctl()? Neither. The only valid way to perform ioctls on blockdevices from kernelspace is ioctl_by_bdev.