From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: jlan@sgi.com, balbir@in.ibm.com, csturtiv@sgi.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Revised locking for taskstats interface
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:15:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060624011551.1bcd4385.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <449CEB7C.3060004@watson.ibm.com>
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:36:28 -0400
Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:52:04 -0400
> >Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Convert locking used within taskstats interface and delay accounting
> >>code to be more fine-grained.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >This patch is based on
> >per-task-delay-accounting-taskstats-interface-fix-exit-race-in-per-task-delay-accounting.patch,
> >which I've noted as `nacked' but didn't drop.
> >
> >So I guess that's now un-nacked?
> >
> >
> Not in intent. This patch reverses all the changes made by that patch.
> So effectively the previous patch is still nacked.
> However, I based this patch on the previous one because you hadn't
> dropped the latter (so we're going round in circles !)
>
> How about I just send one patch that covers the whole locking thing ?
>
Is OK - I'll concatenate these:
per-task-delay-accounting-taskstats-interface-fix-exit-race-in-per-task-delay-accounting.patch
per-task-delay-accounting-delay-accounting-usage-of-taskstats-interface.patch
per-task-delay-accounting-delay-accounting-usage-of-taskstats-interface-use-portable-cputime-api-in-__delayacct_add_tsk.patch
per-task-delay-accounting-delay-accounting-usage-of-taskstats-interface-fix-return-value-of-delayacct_add_tsk.patch
revised-locking-for-taskstats-interface.patch
into a single
per-task-delay-accounting-delay-accounting-usage-of-taskstats-interface.patch
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-24 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-23 17:52 Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-23 20:27 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-24 6:32 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-24 7:36 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-24 8:15 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060624011551.1bcd4385.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=csturtiv@sgi.com \
--cc=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®