From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932337AbWFZSCs (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:02:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932448AbWFZSCr (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:02:47 -0400 Received: from rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de ([129.143.116.10]:48012 "EHLO rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932455AbWFZSCp (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:02:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:02:44 +0200 From: Andreas Mohr To: Chris Rankin Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux-2.6.17: PMTimer results for another PCI chipset Message-ID: <20060626180244.GA6898@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> References: <20060626120847.GA6272@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> <20060626174412.76248.qmail@web52905.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060626174412.76248.qmail@web52905.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Priority: none Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 06:44:12PM +0100, Chris Rankin wrote: > --- Andreas Mohr wrote: > > Yeah, but this is no problem anyway, since it's neither in the blacklisted > > nor in the graylisted area, IOW it's whitelisted and should work > > without delays. > > Or do you get the "The chipset may have PM-Timer Bug" message here?? > > > > > 00:1f.0 Class 0601: 8086:2440 (rev 05) > > > > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801BA_0 0x2440 > > Nope, it's all good. But since this chipset was released between the one which definitely has the > bug and one which might have the bug, I thought that it was worth testing it for real. Oh, then it's a very valid concern indeed! Thanks for verifying that it doesn't seem to be a problem here. (however, given the SMM/SMI BIOS fixups as pointed out by Albert Cahalan, there might still be an issue with this chipset) Andreas Mohr