From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932995AbWFZUBW (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:01:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932997AbWFZUBV (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:01:21 -0400 Received: from pasmtpa.tele.dk ([80.160.77.114]:55983 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932995AbWFZUBU (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:01:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:01:07 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Nix Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kai@germaschewski.name, "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 100% initramfs bloat in 2.6.17 versus 2.6.16 Message-ID: <20060626200107.GA777@mars.ravnborg.org> References: <87psh3mnay.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <87mzbzhk9y.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mzbzhk9y.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 06:57:45PM +0100, Nix wrote: > On 21 Jun 2006, nix@esperi.org.uk stipulated: > > It didn't take long to work out that this was because my initramfs's > > contents were being included twice in the cpio image. > > Ping? Anyone? It is included in kbuild.git - and Linus has been asked to pull that tree. It is also forwarded to stable@kernel.org for inclusion in next stable release. Sam