mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: stsp@aknet.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: the creation of boot_cpu_init() is wrong and accessing uninitialised data
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:04:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060626200433.bf0292af.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1151376313.3443.12.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:45:13 -0500
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:

> The basic problem with this function is that on most architectures
> smp_processor_id() is an alias for current_thread_info()->cpu which
> isn't given its correct value until setup_arch(), so adding a
> boot_cpu_init() that uses it *before* setup_arch() is called is plain
> wrong.  You manage to get away with it 99% of the time because its
> uninitialised value is zero and mostly the id of the booting CPU is
> zero ... but guess who's got a box currently booting on CPU 1 with no
> CPU 0?

preexisting bug, really.  printk() uses smp_processor_id().  Things like
spin_lock() will probably do so in certain debug modes.  We finally got
caught.

> Unfortunately, I can't think of a good solution for what you want to do.
> The thing that looks most plausible is hard_smp_processor_id() which
> reads the actual register value of the processor id.  However, on x86
> (and any other architectures that renumber their CPUs in setup_arch())
> this will ultimately turn out wrong again.

I think arch code should do it before calling start_kernel(), really.  It's
just such a basic part of the kernel framework.

A less wholesome but perhaps simpler solution would be to call the new
setup_smp_processor_id() on entry to start_kernel().


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-27  3:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-27  2:45 James Bottomley
2006-06-27  3:04 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-06-27  3:36   ` James Bottomley
2006-06-27  5:03     ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-27 13:00       ` Keith Owens
2006-06-27 14:01         ` James Bottomley
2006-06-27 14:49       ` James Bottomley
2006-06-28  0:04         ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-28  2:45           ` James Bottomley
2006-06-28  2:57             ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-28 23:10               ` James Bottomley
2006-06-29 16:58                 ` James Bottomley
2006-07-02 14:52                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-02 15:06                     ` James Bottomley
2006-07-02 15:37                       ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060626200433.bf0292af.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stsp@aknet.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®