From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933007AbWFZUGr (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:06:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933003AbWFZUGq (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:06:46 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:26298 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933007AbWFZUGo (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:06:44 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: [Suspend2][ 0/7] Proc file support Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:07:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060626164729.10724.37131.stgit@nigel.suspend2.net> In-Reply-To: <20060626164729.10724.37131.stgit@nigel.suspend2.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606262207.38006.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 26 June 2006 18:47, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Generic routines for implementing the /proc/suspend2 files that allow > the user to configure and tune the subsystem according to their needs. All of the following patches seem to modify the same file: kernel/power/proc.c I'd prefer if these changes were all done in one patch. Rafael