From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030724AbWF0HHK (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:07:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030714AbWF0HHJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:07:09 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:27117 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030713AbWF0HG4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:06:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:06:33 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: hch@infradead.org, swhiteho@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, teigland@redhat.com, pcaulfie@redhat.com, kanderso@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GFS2 and DLM Message-Id: <20060627000633.91e06155.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060627063339.GA27938@elte.hu> References: <1150805833.3856.1356.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> <20060623144928.GA32694@infradead.org> <20060626200300.GA15424@elte.hu> <20060627063339.GA27938@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:33:39 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > Isnt this whole episode highly hypocritic to begin with? Might be, but that's not relevant to GFS2's suitability.