From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422674AbWF0WYJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:24:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422664AbWF0WYI (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:24:08 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:59092 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422671AbWF0WYF (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:24:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:23:51 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Avuton Olrich Cc: Andreas Mohr , Brad Campbell , Nigel Cunningham , Linux Kernel Mailing List , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net Subject: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm Message-ID: <20060627222351.GQ29199@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200606270147.16501.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <20060627133321.GB3019@elf.ucw.cz> <44A14D3D.8060003@wasp.net.au> <20060627154130.GA31351@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> <3aa654a40606270901k4af63de8oe9aa7dde2a2d6a22@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aa654a40606270901k4af63de8oe9aa7dde2a2d6a22@mail.gmail.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 2006-06-27 09:01:33, Avuton Olrich wrote: > On 6/27/06, Andreas Mohr wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 07:22:37PM +0400, Brad Campbell wrote: > >> Pavel Machek wrote: > >> >>Some of the advantages of suspend2 over swsusp and uswsusp are: > >> >> > >> >>- Speed (Asynchronous I/O and readahead for synchronous I/O) > >> > > >> >uswsusp should be able to match suspend2's speed. It can do async I/O, > >> >etc... > >> > >> ARGH! > >> > >> And the next version of windows will have all the wonderful features that > >> MacOSX has now so best not upgrade to Mac as you can just wait for the > >> next version of windows. > >> > >> suspend2 has it *now*. It works, it's stable. > > I'm not sure it's a reason for it to go in, but the truth is suspend2 > does work in more cases, ime. uswsusp is alpha(?) swsusp doesn't work > (for me in most cases), suspend-to-ram doesn't work (probably even > less cases than swsusp), suspend2 works. It's working status for more > of the userbase should (hopefully) be a concideration. When swsusp does not work, there's no point trying uswsusp. It is mostly same code. suspend-to-ram is a very different animal. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html