From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422740AbWF0X5g (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:57:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422742AbWF0X5g (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:57:36 -0400 Received: from 216-99-217-87.dsl.aracnet.com ([216.99.217.87]:131 "EHLO sous-sol.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422740AbWF0X5f (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:57:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:57:24 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Thomas Voegtle Cc: Chris Wright , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.22 Message-ID: <20060627235724.GK11588@sequoia.sous-sol.org> References: <20060622201757.GZ22737@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Thomas Voegtle (tv@lio96.de) wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Chris Wright wrote: > > We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.16.22 kernel. > > The diffstat and short summary of the fixes are below. > > Perhaps I missed the discussion about it, but why is this not piped > through linux-kernel-announce? I stopped making those announcements separately because the automated versions were working well. > It isn't on kernel.org as well so it is hard to track it. Yeah, that's true, the automated logic that tracks that and generates the messages doesn't fit well with multiple -stable versions. thanks, -chris