From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423355AbWF1OTS (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:19:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423356AbWF1OTR (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:19:17 -0400 Received: from MAIL.13thfloor.at ([212.16.62.50]:61931 "EHLO mail.13thfloor.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423354AbWF1OTN (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:19:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:19:12 +0200 From: Herbert Poetzl To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Andrey Savochkin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, serue@us.ibm.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com, clg@fr.ibm.com, Andrew Morton , dev@sw.ru, devel@openvz.org, sam@vilain.net, ebiederm@xmission.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] Network namespaces: IPv4 FIB/routing in namespaces Message-ID: <20060628141912.GC5572@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Lezcano , Andrey Savochkin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, serue@us.ibm.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com, clg@fr.ibm.com, Andrew Morton , dev@sw.ru, devel@openvz.org, sam@vilain.net, ebiederm@xmission.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk References: <20060626134945.A28942@castle.nmd.msu.ru> <20060626135250.B28942@castle.nmd.msu.ru> <20060626135427.C28942@castle.nmd.msu.ru> <449FF5AE.2040201@fr.ibm.com> <44A28964.2090006@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44A28964.2090006@fr.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:51:32PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >Andrey Savochkin wrote: > > > >>Structures related to IPv4 rounting (FIB and routing cache) > >>are made per-namespace. > > Hi Andrey, > > if the ressources are private to the namespace, how do you will > handle NFS mounted before creating the network namespace ? > Do you take care of that or simply assume you can't access NFS anymore ? considering that many providers put their guests on NFS (or similar) filers, and run them on nodes (for distributing the CPU load), that is indeed an interesting question ... what will happen to AOE or iSCSI btw? best, Herbert > Regards > > -Daniel