From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Esben Nielsen <nielsen.esben@googlemail.com>,
Milan Svoboda <msvoboda@ra.rockwell.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Linux-2.6.17-rt3 on arm ixdp465
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:25:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060629122541.GB9709@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0606290803190.25935@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:09:24AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Esben Nielsen wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Milan Svoboda wrote:
> >
> >
> > It seems that dma_unmap_single() on arm contains
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> >
> > unmap_single(dev, dma_addr, size, dir);
> >
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> >
>
> Yeah I saw this too.
>
> > I don't know the dma code on arm. It doesn't look like a per-cpu code but it
> > seems to me that it is not SMP safe and therefore not preempt-realtime
> > safe, either.
> >
> > The hard thing is to figure out which datastructures exactly is protected
> > by those irq-disable and put in a spinlock..
> >
> > I added Deepak Saxena on CC as he seems to be the last one who touched the
> > file.
> >
>
> Well, the following patch may not be the best but I don't see it being any
> worse than what is already there. I don't have any arm platforms or even
> an arm compiler, so I haven't even tested this patch with a compile. But
> it should be at least a temporary fix.
Guys, look at what's in the latest -git from Linus.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-29 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-29 10:17 Milan Svoboda
2006-06-29 11:53 ` Russell King
2006-06-29 12:40 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-29 12:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-29 12:25 ` Russell King [this message]
2006-06-29 12:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-29 13:31 ` Russell King
2006-06-30 6:46 ` Russell King
2006-06-30 18:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-30 19:00 ` Russell King
2006-06-30 19:01 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-29 7:01 Milan Svoboda
2006-06-29 10:03 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-29 9:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-29 12:30 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-28 15:05 Milan Svoboda
2006-06-28 17:02 ` Esben Nielsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060629122541.GB9709@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dsaxena@plexity.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=msvoboda@ra.rockwell.com \
--cc=nielsen.esben@googlemail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome