From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932451AbWF2UlF (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:41:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932459AbWF2UlE (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:41:04 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:10650 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932451AbWF2UlD (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:41:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:44:20 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Dave Jones Cc: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Adding queue_delayed_work_on interface for workqueues Message-Id: <20060629134420.1735adcc.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060629200925.GB13619@redhat.com> References: <20060628141028.A13221@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <20060628143242.486f9b15.akpm@osdl.org> <20060629200925.GB13619@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dave Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 02:32:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > This patch is a part of cpufreq patches for ondemand governor optimizations > > > and entire series is actually posted to cpufreq mailing list. > > > Subject "minor optimizations to ondemand governor" > > > > > > The following patch however is a generic change to workqueue interface and > > > I wanted to get comments on this on lkml. > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Add queue_delayed_work_on() interface for workqueues. > > > > It looks sensible to me. > > *nod*, same here. > > As (for now) cpufreq is the only user of this, any objection to > me marshalling this through the cpufreq tree (+ the cleanups you > suggested of course) ? > Is OK by me. It's good to point out the presence of out-of-scope things like this in the eventual Linus pull request.