From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750738AbWF3BFo (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:05:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750752AbWF3BFo (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:05:44 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:40069 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750738AbWF3BFn (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:05:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:07:06 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Lee Revell Cc: bunk@stusta.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n Message-Id: <20060629180706.64a58f95.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1151628246.22380.58.camel@mindpipe> References: <20060629192121.GC19712@stusta.de> <1151628246.22380.58.camel@mindpipe> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Lee Revell wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 21:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > This patch was already sent on: > > - 26 Jun 2006 > > - 27 Apr 2006 > > - 19 Apr 2006 > > - 11 Apr 2006 > > - 10 Mar 2006 > > - 29 Jan 2006 > > - 21 Jan 2006 > > 3 days ago? That seems a bit silly. Why didn't you just ping Andrew on > it? > > Andrew, what's the status of this? Can we get an ACK or a NACK before > this starts getting reposted every day? ;-) > I am stolidly letting the arch maintainers and the developer of this feature work out what to do.