From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751417AbWF3Ccm (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:32:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751423AbWF3Ccl (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:32:41 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:34758 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751417AbWF3Ccl (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:32:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:35:25 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: Andrew Morton Cc: rlrevell@joe-job.com, bunk@stusta.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n Message-Id: <20060629193525.af983237.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <20060629180706.64a58f95.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060629192121.GC19712@stusta.de> <1151628246.22380.58.camel@mindpipe> <20060629180706.64a58f95.akpm@osdl.org> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.5 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:07:06 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > Lee Revell wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 21:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > This patch was already sent on: > > > - 26 Jun 2006 > > > - 27 Apr 2006 > > > - 19 Apr 2006 > > > - 11 Apr 2006 > > > - 10 Mar 2006 > > > - 29 Jan 2006 > > > - 21 Jan 2006 > > > > 3 days ago? That seems a bit silly. Why didn't you just ping Andrew on > > it? > > > > Andrew, what's the status of this? Can we get an ACK or a NACK before > > this starts getting reposted every day? ;-) > > > > I am stolidly letting the arch maintainers and the developer of this > feature work out what to do. Bah, options that are not Required should default to n. I support Adrian's patch. --- ~Randy