From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932145AbWF3TAp (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:00:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933069AbWF3TAo (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:00:44 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:43026 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933056AbWF3TAm (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:00:42 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:00:30 +0100 From: Russell King To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Steven Rostedt , Esben Nielsen , Milan Svoboda , LKML , Deepak Saxena , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [BUG] Linux-2.6.17-rt3 on arm ixdp465 Message-ID: <20060630190030.GB13429@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Esben Nielsen , Milan Svoboda , LKML , Deepak Saxena , Thomas Gleixner References: <20060630185046.GB29566@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060630185046.GB29566@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 08:50:46PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Well, the following patch may not be the best but I don't see it being > > any worse than what is already there. I don't have any arm platforms > > or even an arm compiler, so I haven't even tested this patch with a > > compile. But it should be at least a temporary fix. > > thanks - i've applied this to -rt, we'll drop it once we rebase to > 2.6.18-rc. Why not apply the one already in mainline which _has_ been tested to fix this issue!?!?! Am I talking to myself here? I've said this three times now, including this message. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core