From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751376AbWGAWwY (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jul 2006 18:52:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751371AbWGAWwY (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jul 2006 18:52:24 -0400 Received: from havoc.gtf.org ([69.61.125.42]:13525 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751346AbWGAWwX (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jul 2006 18:52:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 18:52:12 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: Andrew Morton Cc: Helge Hafting , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown , Reuben Farrelly , Grant Wilson Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 dislikes raid-1, just like mm4 Message-ID: <20060701225212.GA12703@havoc.gtf.org> References: <20060701033524.3c478698.akpm@osdl.org> <20060701181455.GA16412@aitel.hist.no> <20060701152258.bea091a6.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060701152258.bea091a6.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 03:22:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Helge Hafting wrote: > > kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds > > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-CF Rev: 1.64 > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00 > > sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi removable disk sdf > > sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg5 type 0 > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-MS Rev: 1.64 > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00 > > sd 3:0:0:1: Attached scsi removable disk sdg > > sd 3:0:0:1: Attached scsi generic sg6 type 0 > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-SM Rev: 1.64 > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00 > > sd 3:0:0:2: Attached scsi removable disk sdh > > sd 3:0:0:2: Attached scsi generic sg7 type 0 > > Vendor: USB2.0 Model: HS-SD/MMC Rev: 1.64 > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00 > I assume this is still the broken-barriers bug. Thanks for all the help on > this, guys. More is to be asked for, I'm afraid. > > I've prepared a tree which is basically 2.6.17-mm5, only the git-scsi-misc > and git-libata-all trees have been omitted. It's at What does USB storage have to do with SATA? Jeff