From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932612AbWGBJPU (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 05:15:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932615AbWGBJPU (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 05:15:20 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:17545 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932612AbWGBJPT (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 05:15:19 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux ACPI Subject: Re: Battery-related regression between 2.6.17-git3 and 2.6.17-git6 Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 11:15:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton References: <200607020021.15040.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200607020021.15040.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607021115.44739.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sunday 02 July 2006 00:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > With the recent -git on my box (Asus L5D, x86_64 SUSE 10) the powersave > demon is apparently unable to get the battery status, although the data in > /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0 seem to be correct. As a result, battery status > notification via kpowersave doesn't work and it's hard to notice when the > battery is low/critical. > > So far I have verified that this feature works fine with 2.6.17-git3 and > doesn't work with 2.6.17-git6 (-git5 doesn't compile here). > > I'll try to get more information tomorrow (unless someone in the know has > an idea of what's up ;-) ). I've verified that the problem first appeared in 2.6.17-git4. Greetings, Rafael