From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932180AbWGDOnW (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 10:43:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932262AbWGDOnW (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 10:43:22 -0400 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.30.103]:58538 "EHLO faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932180AbWGDOnV (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 10:43:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 16:43:19 +0200 From: Thomas Glanzmann To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext4 features Message-ID: <20060704144319.GO3305@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Glanzmann , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060701163301.GB24570@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11-2006-06-13 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, initial question was: Is there anything besides 64 bit migration going into ext4? > > checksum support for ext4 > Sounds good. When can we expect the initial patch submission? this was actually a question (for which I didn't get an answer by now, even if 34 people replied). I didn't want to start a stupid debate on principials. However I am more interested in snapshots anyway. And if I would provide patches, I would provide snapshot patches. - Which I don't, because I am god damn busy at the moment. Thomas