From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932329AbWGDVCg (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 17:02:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932398AbWGDVCg (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 17:02:36 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:64016 "EHLO spitz.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932329AbWGDVCf (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 17:02:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 18:32:44 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: Fabio Comolli Cc: kernel list , Andrew Morton , mingo@redhat.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm5: lockdep prevents suspend to disk Message-ID: <20060704183244.GB4420@ucw.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > * 2.6.17-mm5 (plus hotfix) suspends/resume to disk > correctly > * adding lockdep testsuite breaks it > > Extract from dmesg: > > Jul 4 21:48:08 tycho kernel: Freezing cpus ... > Jul 4 21:48:08 tycho kernel: Stopping tasks: > ===================================================================================== > Jul 4 21:48:08 tycho kernel: stopping tasks timed out > after 20 > seconds (8 tasks remaining): > Jul 4 21:48:08 tycho kernel: rt-test-0 > Jul 4 21:48:08 tycho kernel: rt-test-1 > Jul 4 21:48:08 tycho kernel: rt-test-2 > Jul 4 21:48:08 tycho kernel: rt-test-3 > Jul 4 21:48:08 tycho kernel: rt-test-4 > Jul 4 21:48:08 tycho kernel: rt-test-5 > Jul 4 21:48:08 tycho kernel: rt-test-6 > Jul 4 21:48:08 tycho kernel: rt-test-7 Are rt-test-X tasks kernel threads or userspace programs? (Kernel threads need explicit try_to_freeze in them to allow suspend). Are they normally killable? Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.