From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964883AbWGHQIU (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:08:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964884AbWGHQIU (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:08:20 -0400 Received: from inti.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.21.155]:8644 "EHLO inti.inf.utfsm.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964883AbWGHQIU (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:08:20 -0400 Message-Id: <200607081333.k68DXM8R004756@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> To: "Randy.Dunlap" cc: David Miller , vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.17 on SPARC64 compile fails In-Reply-To: Message from "Randy.Dunlap" of "Wed, 05 Jul 2006 13:15:39 MST." <20060705131539.ba3275d8.rdunlap@xenotime.net> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.1; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 19) Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:33:22 -0400 From: Horst von Brand X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (inti.inf.utfsm.cl [200.1.21.155]); Sat, 08 Jul 2006 12:08:01 -0400 (CLT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 11:39:11 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote: > > From: Horst von Brand [...] > > > Looking at the relevant file, it seems the offending functions are > > > for PCI only (and my SparcStation Ultra 1 sure doesn't have any PCI > > > in it, so this is disabled in the configuration). Maybe the #endif is > > > too early? > > Yes, I'm still thinking how to fix this. > Do you mean a generalized arch-independent fix? > > > Turn CONFIG_PCI on as a workaround for now. FWIW, 2.6.18-rc1 works fine (it's what I'm running now) -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513