From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030382AbWGHVFa (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 17:05:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030383AbWGHVFa (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 17:05:30 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.140.247.100]:16876 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030382AbWGHVF2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 17:05:28 -0400 Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:09:26 -0300 From: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" To: Jens Axboe Cc: Andrew Morton , Michael Kerrisk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael.kerrisk@gmx.net, vendor-sec@lst.de Subject: Re: splice/tee bugs? Message-ID: <20060708180926.00b1c0f8@home.brethil> In-Reply-To: <20060708064131.GG4188@suse.de> References: <20060707070703.165520@gmx.net> <20060707040749.97f8c1fc.akpm@osdl.org> <20060707131310.0e382585@doriath.conectiva> <20060708064131.GG4188@suse.de> Organization: Mandriva X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; x86_64-mandriva-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jens, On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 08:41:32 +0200 Jens Axboe wrote: | On Fri, Jul 07 2006, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote: | > On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 04:07:49 -0700 | > Andrew Morton wrote: | > | > | On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 09:07:03 +0200 | > | "Michael Kerrisk" wrote: | > | | > | > c) Occasionally the command line just hangs, producing no output. | > | > In this case I can't kill it with ^C or ^\. This is a | > | > hard-to-reproduce behaviour on my (x86) system, but I have | > | > seen it several times by now. | > | | > | aka local DoS. Please capture sysrq-T output next time. | > | > If I run lots of them in parallel, I get the following OOPs in a few | > seconds: | | With the patch posted? You need the i vs nrbufs fix. Yes, it fixes the problem. I didn't try it before because I thought you were going to double check it [1]. Is it suitable for -stable then? [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/7/158 -- Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino