mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Kravetz <kravetz@us.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -rt] Priority preemption latency
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:48:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060711164808.GA5157@w-mikek2.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060615210658.GA19525@monkey.ibm.com>

Hi Ingo,

As you can see from the note below, we are still having issues with
this testcase.  As a reminder Darren's mail with a pointer to the
new testcase is at:

http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0606.1/0729.html

When run with the '-i' option it fails on a regular (aprox 50% on 4 way)
basis.  Any insight into what may be happening would be appreciated.

Thanks,
-- 
Mike

On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:06:58PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:38:24AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > I started running this version of the patch with prio-preemt in a loop
> > over 10 hours ago, and it's still running.  This seems to be the right fix.
> 
> Unfortunately, this test did eventually fail over in our environment.
> John Stultz added the concept of 'interrupter threads' to the testcase.
> These high priority RT interrupter threads, occasionally wake up and
> run for a short period of time.  Since these new threads are higher
> priority than any other, they theoretically should not impact the
> testcase.  This is because the primary purpose of the testcase is to
> ensure that lower priority tasks do not run while higher priority tasks
> are waiting for a CPU.
> 
> After adding these interrupter threads, the tetscase fails (on a system
> here) about 50% of the time.  An updated version of prio-preempt.c is
> attached.  It needs the same headers/makefile/etc as originally provided
> by Darren.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-11 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-10  0:01 Darren Hart
2006-06-10  6:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-10  7:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-11  5:49   ` Darren Hart
2006-06-11  5:58     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-11  6:37       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-11  6:24     ` Darren Hart
2006-06-11  7:36       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-12 15:38         ` Darren Hart
2006-06-15 21:06           ` Mike Kravetz
2006-06-15 22:13             ` Darren Hart
2006-06-15 23:05             ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-15 22:48               ` Mike Kravetz
2006-07-11 16:48             ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2006-06-12 20:12         ` Mike Kravetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060711164808.GA5157@w-mikek2.ibm.com \
    --to=kravetz@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®