From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751171AbWGKSI5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:08:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751172AbWGKSI5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:08:57 -0400 Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk ([195.112.4.54]:7434 "EHLO smtp.nildram.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751171AbWGKSI4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:08:56 -0400 From: Alistair John Strachan To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support? Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:09:22 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: joesmidt@byu.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1152635563.4f13f77cjsmidt@byu.edu> <20060711171238.GA26186@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20060711171238.GA26186@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607111909.22972.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:12, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:32:43AM -0600, Joseph Michael Smidt wrote: > > Will 2.6.18 or 2.6.19 support Intel Wireless 3945ABG? Please cc me since > > I am not subscribed. Thanks. > > It will not be in 2.6.18. Making 2.6.19 is not out of the question, > but it may take some work. Has some agreement been met regarding the mandatory use of the binary regulatory daemon? The webpage seems to suggest it is still necessary, and I'm sure that would disqualify merging the driver with Linux proper. -- Cheers, Alistair. Final year Computer Science undergraduate. 1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.