From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750898AbWGPRd2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:33:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751104AbWGPRd2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:33:28 -0400 Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.36.79]:48747 "HELO smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750893AbWGPRd1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:33:27 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:From:Organization:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=DhcJqWWtdoAacMTz7eVrtm5VcAHT5coNThmRqlW8LPv2vUpgU/M3u/dr1n9G/hRcGBsTU+d7KUglw/ryOIblOWei7l5QupwoqEWNX1IO3a/yhH5jz6q9o9J9+3ELZ1nfA7oRZFO3zhDDWM9DlayLiQ9XgLCswImDNunYTQ54P7k= ; From: Shawn Starr Organization: sh0n.net To: Auke Kok Subject: Re: [2.6.18-rc2][e1000][swsusp] - Regression - Suspend to disk and resume breaks e1000 Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:33:20 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, NetDev References: <200607160509.52930.shawn.starr@rogers.com> <44BA6A4A.5090007@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <44BA6A4A.5090007@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607161333.20858.shawn.starr@rogers.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 16 July 2006 12:33, Auke Kok wrote: > [adding netdev to the cc] > > > unfortunately I didn't. > > e1000 has a special e1000_pci_save_state/e1000_pci_restore_state set of > routines that save and restore the configuration space. the fact that it > works for suspend to memory to me suggests that there is nothing wrong with > that. > > I'm surprised that the t42 comes with a PCI/PCI-X e1000, which changes the > need for this special routine, and the routine does the exact same thing as > pci_save_state in your case. These special routines are made to handle > PCI-E cards properly. > > Also there are no config_pm changes related to this in 2.6.18-rc2. Most of > this code has been in the kernel for a few major releases afaik. This code > worked fine before, so I don't rule out any suspend-related issues. You > should certainly compare with 2.6.18-rc1 and make sure it was a regression, > perhaps even bisect the e1000-related changes if you have the time, which > is about 22 patches or so. > > I'll see if I can find out some more once I get back to work. > > Auke The previous kernel I was using was 2.6.17 vanilla, so between this and -git snapshots I'll have to see where that changed. Thanks , Shawn.