From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932413AbWGSHAW (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:00:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932518AbWGSHAW (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:00:22 -0400 Received: from admingilde.org ([213.95.32.146]:32722 "EHLO mail.admingilde.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932413AbWGSHAV (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:00:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:00:19 +0200 From: Martin Waitz To: Randy Dunlap Cc: lkml , akpm Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel-doc: ignore __devinit Message-ID: <20060719070019.GB30212@admingilde.org> Mail-Followup-To: Randy Dunlap , lkml , akpm References: <44BD5373.20104@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NMuMz9nt05w80d4+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44BD5373.20104@oracle.com> X-PGP-Fingerprint: B21B 5755 9684 5489 7577 001A 8FF1 1AC5 DFE8 0FB2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hoi :) On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 02:32:35PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap >=20 > Ignore __devinit in function definitions so that kernel-doc won't > fail on them. why would it fall over __devinit? And shouldn't we add __{dev}?init{data}? while we are at it? --=20 Martin Waitz --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEvdiDj/Eaxd/oD7IRAlqfAJ90LOp3eB3Gc+cN0Gp19Y2RDpaf/QCfYxLL 8DCrh/bqvCmBx6c0eC1LQ8U= =vm24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+--